A Hollywood director known for the Keanu Reeves-led film 47 Ronin has been sentenced to prison after defrauding Netflix of US$11 million.
Carl Erik Rinsch, 48, was handed a two-and-a-half-year jail sentence after being convicted of federal fraud and money laundering.
He directed 47 Ronin (2013), a big-budget action film inspired by the legendary Japanese tale of masterless samurai seeking revenge, starring Keanu Reeves.
Prosecutors said Rinsch misused funds intended to complete a Netflix sci-fi series, instead spending the money on personal investments and luxury items.
Reeves was among several individuals who attested to Rinsch’s mental health struggles following his conviction last December. In a statement to Manhattan judge Jed Rakoff, Reeves said medication misuse and other factors had worsened issues in the filmmaker’s work and personal life.
The case centres on an unfinished show originally titled White Horse. Netflix had committed around US$55 million to the project, including an additional US$11 million that Rinsch claimed he needed to complete production.
According to prosecutors, Rinsch transferred that money into a personal account, where he invested it and lost nearly half within months. He also spent heavily on cryptocurrency and luxury purchases, including Rolls-Royce cars and high-end mattresses worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Read more: Keanu Reeves to Star in New Live-Action ‘Lego’ Movie With ‘Toy Story 4’ Director Josh Cooley
In court, Rinsch apologised and said he accepted responsibility for his actions. He had faced a potential sentence of up to 90 years but received a lighter penalty. In addition to his prison term, the court ordered three years of supervised release, US$11 million in forfeitures, and a US$700 fine.
US Attorney Jay Clayton said the case sends a clear warning: “Fraud will not be tolerated.”
During the trial in New York, Netflix executives testified that the company had approved only one season of the sci-fi series, which Rinsch ultimately failed to deliver. In a rare move, the director took the stand in his own defence, arguing the situation was a misunderstanding and that he believed the funds were meant to sustain production during the pandemic.
However, reports from The New York Times suggested Rinsch’s behaviour had become increasingly erratic after securing the Netflix deal, with colleagues describing unusual claims about predicting natural disasters and theories about Covid-19.
The case highlights growing scrutiny over how streaming platforms manage large production budgets—and the consequences when those funds are misused.
